Part of the debate – in the Senedd at 4:46 pm on 23 May 2018.
Can I thank David Rowlands and his Petitions Committee for the diligence with which they've worked and produced this report? I'm also grateful to Tim Deere-Jones, who took the trouble to meet with me and brief me on the campaign.
I sit, as does Mike, as the Chair, on the Climate Change, Environment and Rural Affairs Committee, and, of course, we have had discussion of these matters and received evidence. Also, we hold the Cabinet Secretary to account and we have discussed these matters with her.
The position of the Welsh Government, NRW and EDF Energy, the company, which you might expect, is that there isn't a difficulty here in terms of the safety of the operation that's being undertaken. The Cabinet Secretary stated on 29 September that, and I quote:
'it is important to note, the licence is not for the disposal of nuclear waste. The material licenced for disposal is sediment dredged from the Severn Estuary.'
End quote. And I don't think the Welsh Government has changed its position at all. NRW stated that they are confident in CEFAS's competence and believe that
'there is no need to consider licence suspension.'
That, again, is a direct quote from NRW. The CEFAS assessment raised no concerns, quote, 'regarding the level of radiological contamination'. Indeed, they said that what was present was equivalent to eating 20 bananas a year, 10,000 times less than an airline pilot's annual dose and 750 times less than the average dose received by a resident of Pembrokeshire due to radon. Consequently, radioactivity has been found to be so low it equates to not radioactive in law—all these by robust internationally accepted methodologies.
Now, if we do have a wider problem—